Brian Holmes via nettime-l on Fri, 29 Sep 2023 17:50:40 +0200 (CEST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: <nettime> recently published texts on networkcultures.org


Dear all,

Nettime-j, it's a totally interesting idea. I would love to see nettime
become generative beyond its traditional format. In that regard I tried
Mastodon, but I'm just not into chat... or even, incisive but isolated
comments, which would be a more fair description.

Many nettime posts could be published out of the box. I agree with Allan
that the heterogeneous side of the list should be preserved - academic is
fine if you feel it, but there are many ways to write.

Most interesting for me would be a journal that requests from an author or
authors a re-eleaboration of some ideas that came out in a debate. Because
often these debates take place, and retrospectively, the whole subject
becomes much more expansive and interesting and precise than one could
perceive at the start.

That would also discourage people from writing polished things that are
only posted on the list because the author wants to be published in the
journal. Instead we would just take what we are already doing and push it
further, toward something really original that reaches out beyond its own
charmed circle.

all the best, Brian

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 7:05 AM Allan Siegel via nettime-l <
nettime-l@lists.nettime.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> On 29/09/2023 11:57, Christian Swertz via nettime-l wrote:
> > Maybe the journal can be innovative and traditional and open to
> > academic and non-academic authors and audiences? So kind of diverse -
> > like the list? This can be done in a journal, for instance, by
> > creating different departments. Or issues. Or papers. Or formats. One
> > department can be something like "HUMANities" and offer even peer
> > review for those who like or somehow need it, while another department
> > might be "arTworK" where videos, photos, sounds, poems, stories ...
> > are published.
>
> I have nothing against academic journals - but I think the idea is that
> the 'language' we encourage is diverse and even bi-lingual if necessary;
> departments are a good idea, like sections or zones or playgrounds...
> actually I like the idea of arTworK - sections with visual signs like
> paths of discovery...
>
> I am waiting to see if there are other responses to this idea; so far I
> have only seen yours and Geert's interest in the idea of a magazine...
>
> best
> a
>
>
>
> --
> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> # more info: https://www.nettime.org
> # contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org
>
-- 
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org