Mihajlo Acimovic on Tue, 06 Jul 1999 18:57:54 +0200

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Syndicate: Fwd: US arms sales to Milosevi

--------- Forwarded Message ---------
DATE: 06 Jul 99 09:40:51 PDT
From: Andrew.Bacelis@directory.Reed.EDU (Andrew Bacelis)
To: Andrew.Bacelis@directory.Reed.EDU (Andrew Bacelis)

*** ex-yu-a-lista ***

--- Forwarded Message from Tina ---
>Subject: some interesting info on arms sales

US arms, training aided Milosevic
Nearly $1b in weapons shipped

By David Abel, Globe Correspondent, 07/04/99

ASHINGTON - Following a pattern of supplying future foes with high-tech 
weapons, the United States furnished Yugoslavia with nearly $1 billion in 
arms during the past five decades, according to the Pentagon's Security 
Cooperation Agency.

After Slobodan Milosevic came to power in 1987, the United States continued 
the flow of weapons, including fighter aircraft, tanks, and artillery. In 
all, $96 million in arms and training was provided for the Milosevic 
government before 1991, when war in the Balkans brought the program to a 

The United States, which dominates the world's arms trade, sold or gave away 
more than $21 billion in weapons to 168 nations in 1997, the last year 
statistics were available, according to Demilitarization for Democracy, a 
group in Washington that advocates arms control.

''President Clinton justifies today's record arms exports to dictators as a 
way to gain influence and encourage reform,'' said Caleb Rossiter, director 
of Demilitarization for Democracy, saying that at least 52 recipients of US 
arms are nondemocratic nations. ''But the billion-dollar military investment 
in Yugoslavia's dictators was justified in the same way. Kosovar civilians 
suffered from this policy and US forces were placed at risk.''

US officials have long claimed the lucrative arms sales have a purpose 
beyond profit.

During the Cold War, the prime justification was that by providing arms to 
countries such as Somalia or Iraq, both of which later used US weapons 
against American soldiers, the United States ensured their clients would be 
under US influence instead of that of the Soviet Union. Furthermore, 
officials argued that recipients of arms from America were more likely to 
promote US interests and contribute to regional stability.

But since the fall of the Soviet Union, a significantly new justification 
for continued arms sales has emerged: maintaining the US military's 
industrial base in a decade of declining defense budgets.

''This is not a black-or-white issue,'' said Wade Boese, a senior research 
analyst at the Arms Control Association, a Washington think tank. ''Money is 
definitely a factor, and arms sales provide the United States with influence 
on the way militaries develop. But the key point is that weapons outlast the 
regimes they're intended to support.''

Examples abound of US arms sales to friendly governments turned unfriendly. 
In Iran, the United States had helped prop up an autocratic ally during the 
1960s and 1970s with the latest F-14 fighters, Hawk missile batteries and 
modern destroyers. But when the shah's corrupt regime was toppled by Muslim 
fundamentalists led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the new regime usurped 
the modern weapons, instantly becoming a powerful enemy of the United 

Similar examples can be found in many countries, including Panama, Haiti, 
Liberia and Afghanistan. And in some cases, weapons supplied to countries 
still close to the United States have been used for purposes the US 
government later condemned. In Turkey, arms provided by the United States 
have been used to repress the country's Kurdish minority.

The United States first began supplying Yugoslavia with arms in 1950, after 
the nation's leader, Josip Broz Tito, refused to join the Soviet-led Warsaw 
Pact. US military exports to Yugoslavia that decade included 15 F-84G 
Lockheed Thunderstreak fighters, 60 M-47 tanks and hundreds of artillery 
pieces and antiaircraft guns, valued then at more than $723 million.

Military sales fell off in the next two decades but picked up again after 
Tito's death in 1980. In the 1960s and 1970s, the United States sold 
Yugoslavia a mine countermeasure ship and millions of dollars worth of 
sophisticated electronic equipment. In the 1980s, the US government and US 
companies sold the Balkan nation $193 million in air-to-surface missiles and 
air defense radar systems, some of which may have been fired at NATO planes 
during the 11-week air campaign that ended in June.

''It doesn't help to just slap on an embargo after you provide all these 
arms,'' said Anna Rich, a researcher at Washington's Federation of American 
Scientists' Arms Sales Monitoring Project.

The best way to make sure this kind of thing doesn't happen again is by 
Congress passing a general code of conduct.''

A bill was introduced on the floor of the House last month that would 
prohibit arms sales to nondemocratic governments that fail to protect human 
rights, engage in armed aggression and do not fully participate in the UN 
Register of Conventional Arms.

As the bill has so far been drafted, there would be two exceptions: The 
president could request Congress to exempt a country if it is in the 
national security interest to provide military support to that nation or if 
there is an emergency and a vital interest of the United States is 

Many longtime weapons specialists, such as retired Admiral Eugene Carroll, 
said a code of conduct is long overdue. He said US weapons have been turned 
against US diers too many times, he said. He also indicated US arms may have 
been used in war crimes such as those committed by Serbian forces in Bosnia 
and Kosovo. ''The solution is to quit leading the world in the arms trade,'' 
said Carroll, now deputy director of the Center for Defense Information, a 
Washington think tank. ''The fewer arms in the world, the better for the 
United States. There is just less potential for violence.''

This story ran on page A10 of the Boston Globe on 07/04/99.

--------- End Forwarded Message ---------

Angelfire for your free web-based e-mail. http://www.angelfire.com
------Syndicate mailinglist--------------------
 Syndicate network for media culture and media art
 information and archive: http://www.v2.nl/syndicate
 to unsubscribe, write to <syndicate-request@aec.at>
 in the body of the msg: unsubscribe your@email.adress