|Iain Boal on Wed, 29 May 2019 16:10:45 +0200 (CEST)|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|<nettime> No harmony|
|Thanks for the heads-up on this experiment, John. It puts me in mind of the indelible line in Arlene Hutton’s fine play, As It is in Heaven, about Shaker golden age hierarchs - in this case, a couple of eldresses - coping with an outbreak of ‘gifting' visions among the recent novices: ~ “No harmony, girls - you must sing in unison, otherwise we might as well be Baptists."|
Could you elaborate on the category ‘low-latency’ technics? It’s new to me, at least.
On 29 May 2019, at 08:18, John Preston <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
The YouTube algorithm gave me a TED talk by Eric Whitacre  sharing
his work conducting 'virtual choirs' where people recorded their parts
separately and uploaded them to YouTube. The individual performances
were then rendered together to create the final 'performance'. The
project is on-going .
I thought this was a nice example of a work of a traditional medium
being transformed through network technology. Particularly the
asynchronous nature of the process is very different from how a
physically co-located choir would operate, and the result is not a
conventional performance but a recording (hence my previous quote
I'd like to see a live performance by such a physically distributed
choir using low-latency technology.
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: email@example.com # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: