|
ozgur k. via nettime-l on Tue, 26 Sep 2023 13:10:37 +0200 (CEST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: <nettime> The Copy Far "AI" license
|
- To: "<nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets" <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
- Subject: Re: <nettime> The Copy Far "AI" license
- From: "ozgur k. via nettime-l" <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:10:08 +0300
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; rspamd-7d5dc8fd68-74nsf; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=ozgur.k@httpdot.net
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1695726611; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=KNj9cQF/WCM+jy3F0vEencwmVJ8qj1qN9R0D25XBAI8=; b=MZgtISvGGTN1O+Tc+sFhkYQCyZB3vWJhP96f5H4qiqRmB37wbLJ++IYuMJikxBcZ0vzAVF +xNeEjlULUlis91hKaqOVpLAWHIrW7rDwDhwi6koAUiZ9cyf6J9oFBjcM0ixxwIlKv1puJ +LO4BXDCBA5SBMryiLPWk1Wb8gvPa0NzWOKjIqzENetNWTJwC/wkLZSd3Si4sNwKR6+p1D 9ICD0asCBIQ9B/2B3xORXETuXzHkKpT5qvPQvh0bdH03bk8/MD6beOEsI7r7z5xaEXwGC/ U4o8sdp+D4ZFObK+POBlr70wBC36tmhnKnY6Xmdbxav0GU2+ur132wymYNUK9Q==
- Arc-seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1695726611; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=29I4Thoak6r6LYDUKfR9L48zGsugnD0/1k9grVIcT6zB9zU3BIzSI8nZCK5MDmi6vRlJyP Q5AkXF0af+ND5fhELEErCfw3SMeJTicZWE8x9nJZg+1C6Z7t/kV5Md6ceOIxZ3PG1O7fKp njSTMN4t1CjEtlKBBfNW8jgEW8O/ri74By1ng/SjW2yOmO/yMu+aYY9A8oIVbTYg+dhoDt mXKAtFRILNyCjLzP6+V0RynQZ27Wz4ZmdWp0TXUELxUbhClm4RJJKiZPs8+k5tHJm4+Wyt Zm61+l28cjdtZKP8UUvmh+BdffrJ6+Z24JmDTBxmsxiD0MfmxcFLLz1O1kGYLg==
- Cc: "ozgur k." <ozgur.k@httpdot.net>
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 lists.servus.at 7B8B9100575F
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.nettime.org; s=default; t=1695726630; bh=/5/3niVjNTn5MFc/e+ymet7MCFYy2qkZiI6NPUmz5kg=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=QZmJP+SRWehHevtjV3+I1JqCAQJ37uAQOxZBafhC40wyCvdPDyyZkTyafC+hRWk5T 0wBtFTqCTrTMX0cBDLR7/zb8ul0nTGnJiYrIdJkfTbCQVxDkAVl0mF7srBAw0Zmzqt Wp7hoKnnZRUrPYrvoF6IvaOVHx/BOV1+QFf+ouXY=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=httpdot.net; s=dreamhost; t=1695726611; bh=KNj9cQF/WCM+jy3F0vEencwmVJ8qj1qN9R0D25XBAI8=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=o3/y6PvI9cKeFdpEfckxaxNOhLIYE/4CW+4xUJwnT3cxKmcLZzF+ZdFJioS50h8Wg DA7xkfFZD085RYyWTsjJqMwUoezyvriYTiCMfWmqHz+xlNSsgGJlJtWr3qFExlE/Xd XdbPwT3WYX7Qrh3lba45oHGD8r2M+Db7qAMwW/pa28yMQTzefO9isZA8BeyDbFFuPu fs30KJN81F3vQC6tPPx3qqTGNTwwCVw/tH4qX9FnaOQfSXQpUcNPsE746kXjcHc2Yj R27u+euc1Epm0IeO1kRMYbGKoHUTnh0ssvjoLVnDBl0H5lU8Dyxp4uES/5YVXMfoc3 R+tsZFUqk86Jg==
- In-reply-to: <ZQ8I61ybGEShXsgj@localhost>
- References: <ZQ8I61ybGEShXsgj@localhost>
- Reply-to: "<nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets" <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org>
- User-agent: K-9 Mail for Android
On September 23, 2023 6:48:59 PM GMT+03:00, rhatto via nettime-l <nettime-l@lists.nettime.org> wrote:
>Hello nettimers, this might be of interest:
>
> Copy Far "AI" - A license close to copyleft, but far from the so-called
> "Artificial Intelligences": https://copyfarai.itcouldbewor.se
>
>ps: I'm not in the list (please Cc).
"[...]cannot be used for procedures known as "machine learning" and stylometric analysist[...]" https://copyfarai.itcouldbewor.se/ ;
for proprietary ones, it could be a nice strategy/statement, but how about floss and even copyleft floss ones? what if the model is/will be released under a copyleft license? who would benefit more from limiting the use for training copyleft floss uses as well?
i don't know if it is legally possible to enforce the output of copyleft ai tools to be copyleft as well. say, enforcing a program output from a copyleft ai system to be released as copyleft.
even if the copyleft method wouldn't be possible legally and technically for ai situations, isn't it a good.idea to support / encourage the development of floss models over proprietary ones through the statements as in this one?
--
özgür k.
gpg:A3E6 57AD E14D 1F66 A546 6101 BA42 0724 E750 C5AE
--
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: https://www.nettime.org
# contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org