Re: <nettime> Unlocking Proprietorial Systems for Artistic Practice | By Marc Garrett.

["marc.garrett" <marc.garrett@protonmail.com>]

Hi Sascha,

I wish to thank you for reading the introduction.

However, it's obvious you did not read the article itself. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised in respect that even though there are aspects of contemporary society that are challenged and or critiqued, it does express positive examples in real life where good things are happening, rather than 'just' as you say, doom and gloom etc.

I blame myself for not posting the whole thing straight onto the list. 

After this email, I will do just that. 

Thank you for your patience.

Wishing you well.

marc




​Marc Garrett

Co-Founder, Co-Director and main editor of Furtherfield.

Art, technology and social change, since 1996

http://www.furtherfield.org

Furtherfield Gallery & Commons in the park

Finsbury Park, London N4 2NQhttp://www.furtherfield.org/gallery

Currently writing a PhD at Birkbeck University, London

https://birkbeck.academia.edu/MarcGarrett

Just published: Artists Re:thinking the Blockchain

Eds, Ruth Catlow, Marc Garrett, Nathan Jones, & Sam Skinner

Liverpool Press - http://bit.ly/2x8XlMK

Latest post: Unlocking Proprietorial Art Systems interview:

with Artists, Gretta Louw, Antonio Roberts & Annie Abrahams

https://bit.ly/2HQM1bs

Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.​

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On 6 July 2018 6:30 PM, Sascha D. Freudenheim <sascha@sascha.com> wrote:

> Ermahgerd, where to start. How about...
> 
> > > The cultural, political and economic systems in place do not work for
> > > 
> > > most people. They support a privileged, international class that grows
> > > 
> > > richer while imposing increasing uncertainty on others, producing
> > > 
> > > endless wars, and enhancing the conditions of inequality, austerity,
> > > 
> > > debt, and climate change, to own everything under the rule of
> > > 
> > > neoliberalism.
> 
> It seems to me that these two sentences fall victim to exactly the thing
> 
> you're bemoaning. Under the well-established political theory of "It
> 
> Takes One to Know One," this reads like a statement from someone
> 
> belonging to the privileged, international class. (That's not as harsh
> 
> an accusation as it may sound, as it comes from someone who also belongs
> 
> to that class.)
> 
> I will happily admit that yes, the scales of wealth distribution are
> 
> significantly out of whack. So significantly that "significantly" is an
> 
> understatement.
> 
> And yet ... by nearly every agreed-upon measure, the "cultural,
> 
> political and economic systems in place" have contributed to what can be
> 
> called--with equal understatement--a significant reduction in global
> 
> poverty rates. A 74% reduction since 1990 by some estimates.
> 
> Also, those "cultural, political and economic systems in place" have
> 
> contributed to the creation of a vast ecosystem of tools and
> 
> technologies that allow people to communicate, to create, and even to
> 
> travel, across great distances and at significantly lower entry costs
> 
> than ever before. (And yes, yes, the financial/market processes around
> 
> some of these tools have also have contributed greatly to the wealth gap.)
> 
> Also, those "cultural, political and economic systems in place" have
> 
> created massive classes of people who--despite their iron cages!--have
> 
> decided that fuck it, certain work is beneath them. We've seen a fair
> 
> number of examples of this in the U.S. (and elsewhere), where the
> 
> natives (so to speak) don't want to take tough jobs in slaughterhouses
> 
> or working in the fields. The pay can be high and it doesn't matter;
> 
> it's beneath them and so they won't do it. So immigrants, legally
> 
> arrived or not, will happily take their place...
> 
> ...but it hardly seems fair then to basically blame the hard-working
> 
> immigrant for creating the iron cages for all those disaffected/uppity
> 
> poor nationalist natives who don't like the jobs that the "cultural,
> 
> political and economic systems in place" are offering them, despite the
> 
> fact that they're ... jobs.
> 
> Am I saying that things are not tough for many, many people? Absolutely
> 
> not. The debt load for many people is too high. The price of higher
> 
> education is both insane and nonsensical. The climate change challenges
> 
> are broad, unresolved, and frankly, unknown (and thus terrifying).
> 
> But to pretend that despite all of that, everything is in the shitter,
> 
> that everyone is in a cage--or in that cage because of "neoliberalism,"
> 
> as opposed to any and every other ism that has ever been tried--is just
> 
> total balderdash.
> 
> Sascha D. Freudenheim
> 
> sascha@sascha.com
> 
> @SaschaDF
> 
> On 7/6/18 7:39 AM, marc.garrett wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > It's rare that you'll see any posts from me on this list. However, I
> > 
> > thought, perhaps some of you may be interested in the subject of
> > 
> > 'Proprietorial Systems', and my take on it. As some of you may know,
> > 
> > I've been working with Furtherfield for over 20 years now. The context
> > 
> > of the paper reflects a small example of my autoethnographical PhD, at
> > 
> > Birkbeck, London. I am now in my write up period, and will be spending
> > 
> > the next 6 months in it until it's all finished.
> > 
> > Wishing you well.
> > 
> > marc
> > 
> > Unlocking Proprietorial Systems for Artistic Practice | By Marc Garrett.
> > 
> > "Proprietorial domination is the presumption of ownership not only over
> > 
> > our psychic states of existence but also through the material objects we
> > 
> > possess and use daily, and this extends into and through our use of
> > 
> > digital networks every day."
> > 
> > http://www.aprja.net/unlocking-proprietorial-systems-for-artistic-practice/
> > 
> > Introduction
> > 
> > The cultural, political and economic systems in place do not work for
> > 
> > most people. They support a privileged, international class that grows
> > 
> > richer while imposing increasing uncertainty on others, producing
> > 
> > endless wars, and enhancing the conditions of inequality, austerity,
> > 
> > debt, and climate change, to own everything under the rule of
> > 
> > neoliberalism. David Harvey argues that the permeation of neoliberalism
> > 
> > exists within every aspect of our lives, and it has been masked by a
> > 
> > repeated rhetoric around “individual freedom, liberty, personal
> > 
> > responsibility and the virtues of privatization, the free market and
> > 
> > free trade”. (Harvey 11)  Thus; legitimizing the continuation of and
> > 
> > repeating of policies that consolidate capitalistic powers. Pierre
> > 
> > Dardot and Christian Laval in Manufacturing the Neoliberal Subject, say
> > 
> > we have not yet emerged from “the ‘iron cage’ of the capitalist economy
> > 
> > […] everyone is enjoined to construct their own individual little ‘iron
> > 
> > cage’.” (Dardot and Laval 263)
> > 
> > If we are, as Dardot & Laval put it co-designing our own iron cages, how
> > 
> > do we find ways to be less dominated by these overpowering
> > 
> > infrastructures and systems? How do we build fresh, independent places,
> > 
> > spaces and identities, in relation to our P2P, artistic and cultural
> > 
> > practices, individually and or collectively – when, our narratives are
> > 
> > dominated by elite groups typically biased towards isolating and
> > 
> > crushing alternatives? Does this mean that critical thought, aligned
> > 
> > with artistic and experimental cultural ventures, along with creatively
> > 
> > led technological practices, are all doomed to perpetuate a state of
> > 
> > submission within a proprietorial absolute?
> > 
> > To unpack the above questions we look at different types of
> > 
> > proprietorial systems, some locked and unlocked, and consider their
> > 
> > influence on creative forms of production across the fields of the
> > 
> > traditional art world, and media art culture. We look at how artists are
> > 
> > dealing with these issues through their artistic agency: individually,
> > 
> > collaboratively, or as part of a group or collective. This includes
> > 
> > looking at the intentions behind the works: their production and
> > 
> > cultural and societal contexts, where different sets of values and new
> > 
> > possibilities are emerging, across the practice of art, academia, and
> > 
> > technology, and thus, the world.
> > 
> > Part of RESEARCH VALUES | A Peer-Reviewed Journal About Research Values
> > 
> > | VOLUME 7, ISSUE 1, 2018 | Edited by Christian Ulrik Andersen & Geoff
> > 
> > Cox - http://www.aprja.net/research-values/
> > 
> > Marc Garrett
> > 
> > Co-Founder, Co-Director and main editor of Furtherfield.
> > 
> > Art, technology and social change, since 1996
> > 
> > http://www.furtherfield.org
> > 
> > Furtherfield Gallery & Commons in the park
> > 
> > Finsbury Park, London N4 2NQ
> > 
> > http://www.furtherfield.org/gallery
> > 
> > Currently writing a PhD at Birkbeck University, London
> > 
> > https://birkbeck.academia.edu/MarcGarrett
> > 
> > Just published: Artists Re:thinking the Blockchain
> > 
> > Eds, Ruth Catlow, Marc Garrett, Nathan Jones, & Sam Skinner
> > 
> > Liverpool Press - http://bit.ly/2x8XlMK
> > 
> > Latest post: Unlocking Proprietorial Art Systems interview:
> > 
> > with Artists, Gretta Louw, Antonio Roberts & Annie Abrahams
> > 
> > https://bit.ly/2HQM1bs
> > 
> > Sent with ProtonMail https://protonmail.com Secure Email.
> > 
> > distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> > ===============================================================
> > 
> > <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> > ========================================================
> > 
> > collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> > ==============================================================
> > 
> > more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
> > ========================================================
> > 
> > archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org
> > =========================================================
> > 
> > @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
> > ==============================================================
> 
> distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> ===============================================================
> 
> <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> ========================================================
> 
> collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> ==============================================================
> 
> more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
> ========================================================
> 
> archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org
> =========================================================
> 
> @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
> ==============================================================


#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: