Matteo Pasquinelli on Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:30:59 +0200 (CEST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

<nettime> Who seized Simona Torretta?

italian movement and political situation are frozen by this kidnapping.

counter-detections are reaching the mainstream surface, not of the italian 
media of course. we hope in liberation: conspiracy (?) theories mean always the 
worst scenario. /m

follow related fallout on:
_ _ _,2763,1305624,00.html

Who seized Simona Torretta?

This Iraqi kidnapping has the mark of an undercover police operation

Naomi Klein and Jeremy Scahill
Thursday September 16, 2004
The Guardian

When Simona Torretta returned to Baghdad in March 2003, in the midst of the 
"shock and awe" aerial bombardment, her Iraqi friends greeted her by telling 
her she was nuts. "They were just so surprised to see me
They said, 'Why are you coming here? Go back to Italy. Are you crazy?'"

But Torretta didn't go back. She stayed throughout the invasion, continuing the 
humanitarian work she began in 1996, when she first visited Iraq with her 
anti-sanctions NGO, A Bridge to Baghdad. When Baghdad fell, Torretta again 
opted to stay, this time to bring medicine and water to Iraqis suffering under 
occupation. Even after resistance fighters began targeting foreigners, and most 
foreign journalists and aid workers fled, Torretta again returned. "I cannot 
stay in Italy," the 29-year-old told a documentary film-maker.

Today, Torretta's life is in danger, along with the lives of her fellow Italian 
aid worker Simona Pari, and their Iraqi colleagues Raad Ali Abdul Azziz and 
Mahnouz Bassam. Eight days ago, the four were snatched at gunpoint from their 
home/office in Baghdad and have not been heard from since. In the absence of 
direct communication from their abductors, political controversy swirls round 
the incident. Proponents of the war are using it to paint peaceniks as naive, 
blithely supporting a resistance that answers international solidarity with 
kidnappings and beheadings. Meanwhile, a growing number of Islamic leaders are 
hinting that the raid on A Bridge to Baghdad was not the work of mujahideen, 
but of foreign intelligence agencies out to discredit the resistance.

Nothing about this kidnapping fits the pattern of other abductions. Most are 
opportunistic attacks on treacherous stretches of road. Torretta and her 
colleagues were coldly hunted down in their home. And while mujahideen in Iraq 
scrupulously hide their identities, making sure to wrap their faces in scarves, 
these kidnappers were bare-faced and clean-shaven, some in business suits. One 
assailant was addressed by the others as "sir".

Kidnap victims have overwhelmingly been men, yet three of these four are women. 
Witnesses say the gunmen questioned staff in the building until the Simonas 
were identified by name, and that Mahnouz Bassam, an Iraqi woman, was dragged 
screaming by her headscarf, a shocking= religious transgression for an attack 
supposedly carried out in the name of Islam.

Most extraordinary was the size of the operation: rather than the usual three 
or four fighters, 20 armed men pulled up to the house in broad daylight, 
seemingly unconcerned about being caught. Only blocks from the heavily 
patrolled Green Zone, the whole operation went off with no interference from 
Iraqi police or US military - although Newsweek reported that "about 15 minutes 
afterwards, an American Humvee convoy passed hardly a block away".

And then there were the weapons. The attackers were armed with AK-47s, 
shotguns, pistols with silencers and stun guns - hardly the mujahideen's 
standard-issue rusty Kalashnikovs. Strangest of all is this detail: witnesses 
said that several attackers wore Iraqi National Guard uniforms and identified 
themselves as working for Ayad Allawi, the interim prime minister.

An Iraqi government spokesperson denied that Allawi's office was involved. But 
Sabah Kadhim, a spokesperson for the interior ministry, conceded that the 
kidnappers "were wearing military uniforms and flak jackets". So was this a 
kidnapping by the resistance or a covert police operation? Or was it something 
worse: a revival of Saddam's mukhabarat disappearances, when agents would 
arrest enemies of the regime, never to be heard from again? Who could have 
pulled off such a coordinated operation - and who stands to benefit from an 
attack on this anti-war NGO?

On Monday, the Italian press began reporting on one possible answer. Sheikh 
Abdul Salam al-Kubaisi, from Iraq's leading Sunni cleric organisation, told 
reporters in Baghdad that he received a visit from Torretta and Pari the day 
before the kidnap. "They were scared," the cleric said. "They told me that 
someone threatened them." Asked who was behind the threats, al-Kubaisi replied: 
"We suspect some foreign intelligence."

Blaming unpopular resistance attacks on CIA or Mossad conspiracies is idle 
chatter in Baghdad, but coming from Kubaisi, the claim carries unusual weight; 
he has ties with a range of resistance groups and has brokered the release of 
several hostages. Kubaisi's allegations have been widely reported in Arab 
media, as well as in Italy, but have been absent from the English-language 

Western journalists are loath to talk about spies for fear of being= labelled 
conspiracy theorists. But spies and covert operations are not a conspiracy in 
Iraq; they are a daily reality. According to CIA deputy director James L 
Pavitt, "Baghdad is home to the largest CIA station since the Vietnam war", 
with 500 to 600 agents on the ground. Allawi himself is a lifelong spook who 
has worked with MI6, the CIA and the mukhabarat, specialising in removing 
enemies of the regime.

A Bridge to Baghdad has been unapologetic in its opposition to the occupation 
regime. During the siege of Falluja in April, it coordinated risky humanitarian 
missions. US forces had sealed the road to Falluja and banished the press as 
they prepared to punish the entire city for the gruesome killings of four 
Blackwater mercenaries. In August, when US marines laid siege to Najaf, A 
Bridge to Baghdad again went where the occupation forces wanted no witnesses. 
And the day before their kidnapping, Torretta and Pari told Kubaisi that they 
were planning yet another high-risk mission to Falluja.

In the eight days since their abduction, pleas for their release have= crossed 
all geographical, religious and cultural lines. The Palestinian group Islamic 
Jihad, Hizbullah, the International Association of Islamic Scholars and several 
Iraqi resistance groups have all voiced outrage. A resistance group in Falluja 
said the kidnap suggests collaboration with foreign forces. Yet some voices are 
conspicuous by their absence: the White House and the office of Allawi. Neither 
has said a word.

What we do know is this: if this hostage-taking ends in bloodshed, Washington, 
Rome and their Iraqi surrogates will be quick to use the tragedy to justify the 
brutal occupation - an occupation that Simona Torretta, Simona Pari, Raad Ali 
Abdul Azziz and Mahnouz Bassam risked their lives to oppose. And we will be 
left wondering whether that was the plan all along.

Jeremy Scahill is a reporter for the independent US radio/TV show Democracy 
Now; Naomi Klein is the author of No Logo and Fences and Windows

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: contact: