robert m. tynes on Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:38:49 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

<nettime> Feds Grab Domain Names (AP)

Feds grab Internet domain names

SAN JOSE, California (AP) --Federal agents routinely seize property
allegedly used in the commission of a crime, anything from a drug dealer's
car or speedboat to a hacker's computer.

In a series of raids in recent weeks, the Justice Department has extended
such grabs to property that might seem esoteric but worry civil
libertarians -- Internet domain names.

Warnings posted 
In one case, the government took over Web sites that it
said peddled bongs, roach clips, rolling papers and other paraphernalia
used in the consumption of illegal drugs.

Prosecutors also acquired, in a plea agreement, a site called
whose owner was charged with selling special chips that let pirated titles
run on videogame consoles.

In the past, Web sites simply vanished after the computer servers that
hosted them landed in police property rooms. But in the recent cases, the
sites remained alive, greeting visitors with stern warnings from
government agencies.

The trend is alarming online civil liberties groups and legal scholars,
who say the government's new tactic risks depriving people of valuable
property -- their Internet storefronts and thus their livelihoods -- as
electronic commerce becomes more common.

"If you want to take down a Web site but simply confiscate the servers,
operators can always buy other servers," said Michael Overly, an attorney
specializing in computer law at Foley & Lardner. "But if they take the
domain name away, then they've put the person out of business."

Concerns about privacy
Critics of the Justice Department's recent moves also say they fear the
government could use the new method to spy on Web surfers who visit
confiscated sites.

"The government is suddenly in a position of being able to monitor the
Web-surfing activities of unwitting individuals who believe they are going
to a Web site ... but possibly implicating themselves into some law
enforcement investigation," said David Sobel, general counsel of the
Electronic Privacy Information Center.

Visitors to, and others are now greeted with
a message informing them that a Pennsylvania federal court has
"restrained" the sites at the request of the Drug Enforcement

In announcing the indictment last week of 55 people for allegedly selling
drug paraphernalia on the Internet, Attorney General John Ashcroft said
several sites had been redirected to DEA servers and that prosecutors had
asked the court to redirect another "15 to 20 sites within the next 30

The Justice Department did not return repeated phone calls seeking comment
on what it plans to do with the sites and their visitor logs.

A DEA spokeswoman, Tara DeGarmo, noted that the domain names in the head
shop case were "retained" but not seized pending the outcome of the
criminal cases. She referred questions to federal prosecutors, who did not
return calls.

How surfers are identified
That leaves privacy activists guessing.

"You can spin this out to future situations where there are a lot of
classes of individuals the government might like to have a list of," such
as visitors to terrorism- or biological weapons-related sites, Sobel said.

On the Internet, Web surfers are identified with a unique number, or
Internet Protocol address. Devices on the Internet need such an address to
send and receive Web, e-mail and other traffic.

Domain names are the Web's equivalent of the front door of a
bricks-and-mortar business. But while businesses can physically relocate
in the material world, in cyberspace they depend on their domain name. The
physical location of the Web site is immaterial.

Among issues that remain unresolved in the courts is whether a domain name
constitutes property, or a contract the owner has with the domain name
registrar -- the company that provided the name. If the former, a domain
name could indeed be seized like a car, house or computer.

Guarding anonymity In the past, domain name registrars have sued to ensure
that their offerings are not considered property. Otherwise, Overly said,
"they would find themselves at the heart of no end of litigation."

The registrars involved in the head shop investigation either declined to
comment or did not return telephone calls.

Domain transfers have in the past occurred as a result of criminal or
civil cases, but Overly said the courts would ultimately decide the issue.

"The government has done many things over the years," he said, "that
ultimately turn out not to be legal."

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: contact: