| brian carroll on 10 Nov 2000 17:34:55 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> Re: Energy, Elections, and the Internet (ii) |
Bush the 2nd, General Swartzkopf, Gen. Colin Powell,
Former CIA Director and President Bush the First,
and Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense, at the
Helm. i wonder how all these old Cold Warriors,
whom thrive on authoritarian and totalitarian,
non-democratic structures of militarism, are
going to do at protecting human rights and
freedoms of speech and liberty and conscience,
when it is not in their institutional nature
to do so. a General, as a General, does not
function in a democratic realm, but in a
hierarchical, top-down structure of total
control. add some idealism/dogma, and a
thousand messiahs to the cause, and the
'New Republican Era', as they've announced
it, has been birthed. not by the 3% Nader
voters, not by the 48% Gore voters. but by
the 49% of Bush voters whom identify with
the simplistic view of media personification
as 'President as friend and good neighbor'
that the mass media has amplified so well.
that is, the personality as larger-than-
life, the newest electronic icon in the
pantheon of the mythic nation-state.
the Democrats, at least on tv, are turning
on the Naderites as their reason for losing.
not their own rightward drift and playing the
center and ignoring progressive politics. it
was inevitable, the shift, as the trade-off
had a price that will now be paid. the illusion
is now over. reality will set in, that the
Conservatives are in control, and have been,
the whole time. it started with the 3rd party
of Ross Perot, with his charts and graphs
showing the US federal deficit. Clinton took
it up as his cause, and the Clinton economy
took off. Nader, not having the money to do
the infomercials that Perot did to promote
his cause, did not get into the debate by
getting into the media. instead, he and his
challenging ideas were and continue to be
ignored, and are deemed utopic.
the media protected Bush. they played it
Conservative. it is hard to imagine that their
uncritical analyses will ever cut into who
Bush really is as a public citizen. insider trading
violations with the Security and Exchange Commission.
the Driving under the Influence 20+ years ago got
some attention, who really cares, but the cocaine
use attributed to Bush the 2nd never got air time.
ironic, if Bush the First waged a war after Noriega
while his son, George the 2nd, potentially the first
King of the US, was snorting it in the Presidental
bathroom. no problem with it, really, besides the
fact that the candidate in question is running
on the platform of bringing 'truth and dignity
to the White House.' it is not hypocrisy, it is
levels beyond that- it is a downright coup d'etat.
wonder why there is no mention of Bush the 2nd going
AWOL during his National Guard duty during Vietnam,
and receiving no 'consequence', like he proposes
everyone who does not 'obey the law' is due. Prison
builders, of the mind, and death penalty users,
against any remote idea of any 'immoral' crime.
"They are going to get the Ultimate Consequence:
The Death Penalty." he said of three (actually 2)
Texas Death Row inmates during the second presidential
debate. not once, not twice, but three times Bush the
2nd declared this with glee- without any substantial
critique by the media.
General Swartzkopf, campaigning in the closing
days with Bush in Florida, was given airtime to
call Vice President Gore 'a liar', which was then
broadcast across the country via radio, tv, and
by the newspapers. this is a general of the US
Military, calling the VP a liar. untruthful.
e.g., deceitful. to me this is scary as hell
when Generals join the political punditry of
the media image. their call-to-arms is not to
get out the vote, it is to wage war. apparently
the US military is preparing itself for a long
stay in the White House Oval Office and such, as
Bush I, Bush II, Cheney, Swartzkopf, Powell, and
probably Dole and McCain will join the ranks of
the military elite, intelligence community,
command and control, and the legendary 'American
Heroes' in guiding the country ('and the World')
into the 21st century.
the 'democratic' mass media (misnomer, that is),
having been conservative in their reporting, now
will have dug their own grave. for example, a
scenario of authoritarian boardroom influence on
free expression in the press (and, Internet):
A local TV reporter attempts to do an expose' on George
the 2nd's shady background on insider trading and sweetheart
deals with Texas oil and energy companies. it is about to
be broadcast, when a rumor hits the boardroom of the pending
broadcast. the local station, say NBC, is owned by a parent
company, say General Electric, whom is tied into the highly
monopolistic energy production and supply industry, which
in turn ties back into billion dollar market relationships
with energy companies such as Enron which financed Bush's
political career, and whose special interests he protects
and tries to enhance 'for the Good of America.' it seems
a critique of government by `free' media, which is itself
owned by the private people whom may put the Bush government
in place, ironically, happens to be run by authoritarian
leaders from the military and intelligence communities.
will democratic free speech prevail? or will a hyper-
surreal self-censorship and purging of dissent occur
for all those whom do not follow the party line... from
the mass media whom have to obey, to further restrictions
and monitoring of dissenting free speech online the inter-
network?
like the game scoreboards that reporters were using
to chart the election exit polls like a football game,
will the false-reality of choice and freedom disappear
to a simplistic authority of pseudo-choice, that being
the 'right' or wrong choice, whereby the opposition
grows and the militarists are in office, as media
celebrities, like Stormin' Norman, whom had his own
television special 2 weeks before the election on
his Gulf War victory. the subtle, now literalized.
don't be scared- be prepared. that's what i'm telling
myself over and over. and yet it is awfully isolationist
in America tonight. people hoped for what they thought
was `the best' and got the worst. makes me really wonder
if mass democracy and representation work well at all,
given the ambiguity of the public-private enigma that
looms larger than ever before over the American psyche.
it is about organizing, i hear. yet, nobody seems to
care much about commonality from a philosophical or a
mundane perspective. yet, it is so very fundamental to
the future of geopolitics and the Internet. to nuclear
war and global warming. to being able to feed oneself
and drink clean water. time to get back to the basics.
enough new words. enough endless texts about variants
on a theme. time for a common language, a structure
from which to organize a larger movement for change.
some say "it's not time yet." let's make it the time.
shared energy + shared work = shared power
human being bc
the architecture of electricity
http://www.architexturez.com/ae/
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net