Peter Lunenfeld on Wed, 10 May 2000 18:21:21 +0200 (CEST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: <nettime> MTAA interview etoy.CORPORATION

>etoy: etoy doesn't espouse any theory, we leave this up to other people.
>Of course we are happy if precedents from art history can explain the
>things that we do. But we are don't connect directly to other artists.
>We're influenced, Warhol and Beuys are very important to us. But it's not
>our discourse. We refuse the intellectualization of our discourse, it has
>to stay strong and clean. 

etoy's insistence that their work is entirely "new" and their disavowal of
connections is in fact just one of many ways in which they "connect
directly" to techno-art historical precedents. As for their dopey
dichotomy between intellectualism and "strong and clean" discourse, I
leave the precedents to your historical memory, but suggest setting your
time machine back 61 years.

Peter Lunenfeld

#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: contact: