integer on 28 Jul 2000 09:02:22 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Nettime-bold] (no subject)



>At 08:52 AM 28/07/00 +0200, integer@www.god-emil.dk wrote:
>>dom!naz!on = propagatd b! dze dom!natd
>
>Well perhaps.

uel. dear.
! am 01 buterfl! hensz 
= akua!ntd avec fakt
uen ! = flap m! u!ngz
= 01 z!klone _pred!ktabl!
developz !n .au



>But that's either a fairly neoliberal attitude/slogan, or a flat out 
>tautology.

dze velt = 01 tautolog!e.

ud u l!ke 2 shoot rubber bandz 
at dze moon 2 n!ght - avec mo! +?

!t = 01 fantast!sch eczper!ensz.
relaxant + en.jo!abl + !mprovz dze !mag!naz!e.


>Not at all up to your usual standard.


uear do buterfl!ez kom 4rom +?
4rom dreamz z!l!.


nn


01 virtual architecture assemblage of crumple-free materie
the chaotic tremor of finite resolution towards the progress of
01 trajectory as noise constantly resetting the trajectory is 

    .-.                                                               .-.
   /   \           .-.                                 .-.           /   \
  /     \         /   \       .-.     _     .-.       /   \         /     \
-/-------\-------/-----\-----/---\---/-\---/---\-----/-----\-------/-------\
          \     /       \   /     \_/   `-'     \   /       \     /
           \   /         `-'                     `-'         \   /
            `-'   


Cordialement. NN.







                                          pre.konssept!ěn  
                                                meeTz ver!f1kat!ěn.     



-

Netochka Nezvanova
f3.MASCHIN3NKUNST
@www.eusocial.com
17.hzV.tRL.478
                                                    e
                                                    |
                                                     |  +----------
                                                    |  |     <   
                                   \\----------------+  |  n2t      
                                                       |       >
                                                       e





>It's rather like saying that poverty exists because of the presence of the 
>poor;
>or that poverty is propagated by the poor.
>
>I think not.
>
>The more likely scenario, or what I suspect will happen, or what perhaps is 
>happening, is that the system of public enclosure has just about reached 
>its limits.
>
>Then what?
>
>Well, the system will change in some fundamental way. I still get to do my 
>art and own my own existence to a much greater extent than when I was a 
>professional musician.
>
>I am not prepared to make predictions, although history appears to have 
>scrawled a rather bleak mud map of our immediate future.
>
>Phil



_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold