Dan Mitchell on Thu, 22 Jun 2000 00:00:32 +0200 (CEST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Nettime-bold] Re: Deja move 'complete' (sequel to "huh?")



 >If after all this time no one has figured out how/where to archive all this
 >material, then perhaps one should look to whomever (if anyone) who is
 >actually responsible for the Usenet rather than knee-jerking without two
 >clues . . .

It's the Tri-lateral Commission, isn't it Mark?




At 01:19 PM 6/21/00 -0400, Newmedia@aol.com wrote:
>Folks:
>
>It is now nearly two years since Dejanews.com became Deja.com, complete with
>both many press releases about their attempt to build a profitable business
>-- which they have not yet accomplished -- and with many outcries about their
>"change" in direction (they originally only adopted the Usenet as a handy
>database for testing their database software) . . .
>
>If after all this time no one has figured out how/where to archive all this
>material, then perhaps one should look to whomever (if anyone) who is
>actually responsible for the Usenet rather than knee-jerking without two
>clues . . .
>
>Best,
>
>Mark Stahlman
>
>#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
>#  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
>#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
>#  more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
>#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net


_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold