| integer on Tue, 13 Jun 2000 23:53:12 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| [Nettime-bold] (no subject) |
Michael Goldhaber <mgoldh@well.com>
>Wait a minute!
01 regurg!taz!e
>Clearly, McKenzie Wark is getting paid for publishing on
>nettime. Otherwise why would he do it? I want my share.
= 1nz du = komput uat McKenzie Wark = haz ztatd peut etre.
>The truth is, of course,
du = 01 lo.tekk zlave unabl 2 dekomp!l
01 ema!l +?
> Wark hopes to be paid --in attention , and this
>is the main benefit to academics who publish anything While I agree with
>him that publishers should not be allowed to obtain unlimited rights
>just for publishing something, the vast majority of academics would
>barely make enough money for a good lunch out annually from their
>writings even if royalties were assiduously collected. Still, many gain
>considerable attention directly or indirectly through their
>publications, which leads to rewards of all kinds.
>
>If Wark is serious about copyright vigilance for reproduction, he should
>eschew publishing on nettime. But giving up the international attention
>would be a mistake that could lead, for instance, to his not being
>invited to the next international conference. Likewise, keeping
>hisphotocopied words out of the reach of a few students who chooose not
>to pay for compiled "readers" (as they must on most US campuses ) might
>mena a loss of some of the best followers he might otherwise get.
>--
>Best,
modl c!t!zn
>Michael H. Goldhaber
eusocial.com -> superb source for modl c!t!zn antibodies.
pre.konssept!Øn
meeTz ver!f1kat!Øn.
-
Netochka Nezvanova
f3.MASCHIN3NKUNST
@www.eusocial.com
17.hzV.tRL.478
e
|
| +----------
| | <
\\----------------+ | n2t
| >
e
_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold