Andrew Murphie on Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:15:50 +0100 (CET)
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime-ann> FCJ new issue—"What Now? : The Imprecise and Disagreeable Aesthetics of Remix"—the Fibreculture Journal issue 15
- To: nettime-ann <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: <nettime-ann> FCJ new issue—"What Now? : The Imprecise and Disagreeable Aesthetics of Remix"—the Fibreculture Journal issue 15
- From: Andrew Murphie <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:47:58 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=++oXuKYQeW43wscwuNx78LRM91smXJWeqIS/i+HWzJ8=; b=xxKinYwouwqJ1SCuPCQLk1Hjec5WBrUZDAdc7tV1RKeokjp0bRo3aNZnuFazkzqDxt ucW/4EVwmAXR46N3LUVyvH4WxxxYgbL7GNj1WD3fledqdSNxF9e9QzdmQ/Rs133dkkN8 d4cH3tb2QR9VaeRtNQmtkEkTDiADT9BDa0/30=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=f9DoZ+uX1Ll3QP+BiCHZZCS/pXpLa4KfH/XfogNm0MLq2uZ9jo+HdOT4l242DctU+V yPcno2JMr5WS50P4dzIgtgKvajGtyxBGRw4HSVtY0d40WqaHzhcmm9sDt04b8thcHP8P T8at5SRjjpdHHYm2ZrDa+eT1u+WIJHRkTEjfI=
The Fibreculture Journal is affiliated with the Open Humanities Press -
The Fibreculture Journal is a peer reviewed international journal that encourages critical and speculative interventions in the debate and discussions concerning information and communication technologies and their policy frameworks, network cultures and their informational logic, new media forms and their deployment, and the possibilities of socio-technical invention and sustainability. The Fibreculture Journal encourages submissions that extend research into critical and investigative networked theories, knowledges and practices.
What Now? : The Imprecise and Disagreeable Aesthetics of Remix
Issue Editors: Darren Tofts (Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne) and Christian McCrea (Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne)
The Renewable Tradition (Extended Play Remix)
Cultural Modulation and The Zero Originality Clause of Remix Culture in Australian Contemporary Art
Ross Rudesch Harley
How can you be found when no-one knows that you are missing?
James Brown, Sample Culture and the Permanent Distance of Glory
Materialities of Law: Celebrity Production and the Public Domain
Materiality of a Simulation: Scratch Reading Machine, 1931
From the Editorial (http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue15/):
It became a minor phenomenon during 2007. By September 2009 it was a virus out of control. Described in Wired as a ‘popular internet meme’ (Wortham, 2008), the obsessive serial mash-up of a key sequence from Oliver Hirschbiegel’s 2004 film of the last days of Adolf Hitler, Der Untergang (The Downfall), is suggestive of the cultural logic of the contemporary formation known as remix. Remix culture is comprised of what could loosely be termed amateurs and professionals engaged in the practice of creatively re-using found material. The distinction is useful in identifying the aesthetic and material differences between dedicated intermedia remix artists (Negativland, Martin Arnold, Craig Baldwin, Soda_Jerk), artists who incorporate elements of remix into a broader audiovisual practice (Philip Brophy, Candice Breitz, Christian Marclay, John Zorn) and the vernacular audio-visual mash-up/remake/dub/scratch aesthetics associated with a broad range of online practices. The domestication of audio-visual literacies in the digital age has meant that the processes of sampling, editing and compositing – once the province of dedicated adepts – have become second nature for a generation weaned on computers and digital technology. Audio-visual remix attests to a utilitarian competence in ‘writing’ for the communications paradigm of the internet and networked conditions that Gregory L. Ulmer famously termed ‘electracy’; a concept that prioritises the notion of the ‘remake’ and the use of found material (Ulmer, 1989, 1994, 2005, Tofts, 1996). As well, this pervasive cultural competence (in Chomsky’s linguistic sense of the term) attests to the dramatic distribution of the material means of production into the hands of consumers.
The Downfall meme is a portrait in miniature of the doxa of contemporary remix; namely, the collaborative, socially-networked taste for creatively manipulating work made by someone else. These received ideas presume the assurance of an invisible yet simpatico audience of like-minded, DIY-capable remixers alive to the vertiginous pleasure of knowing that anything labeled a remix is one file in a conjugate (yours, mine, ours) Shareware .zip archive of infinite re-use. In other words, an assurance of many happy returns.  The Downfall meme is a weird internet event in that it has garnered the kind of concentrated anticipation on a singular event usually associated with cult television series, or, more distantly, the narrow band era of broadcast television (see Palmer, 2008). As remix artist and theorist Dan Angeloro has suggested, we are witnessing a ‘popular movement of incredible momentum – the copy/cut/paste logic of contemporary internet culture’ (Angeloro, 2006: 20).
Forthcoming Issues of FCJ: early 2010—Counterplay; May 2010—Media Ecologies
Forthcoming CFPs for FCJ: "Trans"; "Contemporary Media and Sustainability"
"Take me to the operator, I want to ask some questions" - Barbara Morgenstern
"A traveller, who has lost his way, should not ask, Where am I? What he really wants to know is, Where are the other places" - Alfred North Whitehead
"I thought I had reached port; but I seemed to be cast back again into the open sea" (Deleuze and Guattari, after Leibniz)
Andrew Murphie - Associate Professor
School of English, Media and Performing Arts, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 2052
Editor - The Fibreculture Journal http://journal.fibreculture.org/>
fax:612 93856812 tlf:612 93855548 email: firstname.lastname@example.org
room 311H, Webster Building
nettime-ann mailing list