| Francis Hunger via nettime-l on Sun, 7 Jan 2024 10:38:40 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: <nettime> “I’ve built a simple AI” |
Dear Olia,thank you so much for your pointed observations. I would like to extend on both Sophia and Jarvis. Both seem to be driven by control and automation phantasies on the one hand and anthropmorphization on the other. "I’ve built a simple AI" already uses this "a AI", ascribing agency (with the implication it would be human-like agency) to it, obscuring the human labor behind it and the machinic limitations it necessarily has.
The Team behind Sofia, for instance, consists of the CEO, the animation and interaction designers, the software enginieers, the content developers, robotic face architect, robotics engineers, a production supervisor, a language processing A"I" engineer, IT-Manager, office staff, events coordinator and freelance project workers according to their website. A team of at least 23 humans to get an elaborated deception, a version of a mechanical turk, running.
Interestingly Sofia is this embodied, female slave, while Zuckerbergs male voiced Jarvis is disembodied and omnipresent in his house.
I also liked your point behind marketing A"I" as a _product_ as in the Jarvis case because I didn't see it from this angle. I rewatched this demo video which (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvimBPJ3XGQ) pretty much addresses almost all phantasies a master could expect of his slave AI, waking him up gently, providing a schedule of the day, preparing a toast, surveilling and teaching the child, surveilling and providing access at the door (for Zuckerbergs parents). What is excluded in this narration is of course the master's violence against the slave, the brutal availability of sexual services, but yes we are in advertisement, I get it.
The video has a humorous moment built in, where Mark asks Jarvis to play "the best Nickelback songs" and Jarvis answers passive agressively "I'm sorry Mark, I'm afraid I can't do that, there are no good Nickelback songs". Intented as a funny moment, it anticipates the "sorry, I'm afraid" we read in every redacted or censored GPT answer today.
But it also has this moment of disobedience, which Mark diffuses by answering (while his wife sits silently on the sofa besides him, swinging gently the baby, failing even the simplest Bechdel test): "Okay, how about just play some songs our whole family likes". To which a children song follows. It is intriguing, how Mark dominates Jarvis, as well as Priscilla and their first daughter Maxima just by his masters voice.
But this short moment of non-function or disobedience also ties in with some of our (humans) largest fears when it comes to automation: being dominated by robots as the other side of dominating them. This fear of being dominated that may turn into the pleasure of being dominated as in a proper SM relationship. In this sense the Jarvis product demo contains all tropes of countless science fiction books and movies.
Having had Covid twice in winter, I re-watched lot of the star treck series, a guilty pleasure. I apologize. And it stuck with me, to what large extend this series (one example of many) deals with the human-machine domination subdomination theme: Data, Seven of Nine, the Emergency Medical Hologram, the caretakrer, Vic Fontaine are constantly involved in these tropes.
I agree with you that A"I" has become an object to be marketed. We are dealing with a double dimension here. In the imaginary space A"I" is also a phantasmatic object of domination and submission, tied to the dimensions of sadism and masochism and the master-slave logic.
I would love to see tiktok edits crossing the Jarvis product demo with Star Treck tropes, addressing this double dimension.
Warm regards, Francis
Happy new year, dear nettimers!In the mid of AI summer, I often think back about last spring, and one product, or rather it's announcement, that brought us to where we are now./https://pad.profolia.org/s/I_ve_built_a_simple_AI -- illustrated version with links /AI’s 75 year history is a chain of periods filled with excitement and anticipation of the singularity, taking turns with times of ignorance known as AI winters. I on purpose count from right after WWII – 1946, when Mechanical (later Machine) Translation effort has started, and not from 1956 when the term AI was coined, because the term is less important when the idea that machines can perform understanding (of languages), and also because it was exactly the failure of Machine Translation that designated beginning of the first known AI winter in the beginning of 1960’s. On the eve of 2024 we, no doubt, are enjoying AI midsummer. It’s so brutally, unnaturally hot, that some start to suspect that this time it won’t be just a winter that will compensate for the heat, but rather something usually depicted as an ice age or a nuclear winter is in front of us. It will be very cold and dark for a very long time… The last winter, which was caused by the failure of the 5th generation computer and logic based AI systems in the late 80’s was rather short. It was over in the mid 90’s. From that time research in machine learning grew steadily. But science and industry seasons do not necessarily correlate to the one’s in mass media. Public attention at that time was glued to the Internet, WWW, Social Networks and all of the above becoming magically available on mobile devices in the end of the noughties. In the beginning of the tens mass media started to report about Big Data and the Internet of Things. Let’s, from today’s perspective, call it a thaw. Real spring, or mass media AI spring started in 2016. I see 3 events that made a break in popular consciousness:– Hanson’s humanoid robot Sophia, – Google’s neural network algorithm Deep Dream and – Mark Zuckerberg’s Jarvis.One still remembers Sophia’s glorious appearances at the United Nations and on the covers of lifestyle magazines. Sophia’s existence also started a wave of discussion about ethics in AI and social robotics, that are still actual and vital. Psychedelic images of Deep Dream are also hard to forget. And the impact of the algorithm is still here since style transfer and surreal visuals became AI’s flagship businesses. But Jarvis? Why do I even mention this rather modest personal project of Zuckerberg to control his house facilities through his phone? The app itself was not remarkable, but the words that announced it were.There were two posts. On January 3, 2016, Zuckerberg published his New Year resolution: “My personal challenge for 2016 is to build a simple AI to run my home and help me with my work.” And on December 19, 2016 he reported “I’ve built a simple AI”. These posts quoted many times during 2016 and 2017 started a trend talking about AI as if it is an app, a product, something at hand. “I’ve built a simple AI” played a big role in bringing AI to where it is now – a whirlwind of crap, when not only every further automation in software products, but simply every new function or feature is marketed as Artificial Intelligence. That AI became a synonym to a chatbot is somewhat historically justifiable. But there is hardly any app today that is not marketed as AI. A filter is an AI, a file is referred to as an AI output. Ai (only A is upper case, as if a given name) in the slang of Humane and name of their Ai Pin is the sign of the same process. AI is an object, let’s call it Ai. In 2016 “I’ve built a simple AI” suggested that AI was a thing. Could be simple, could be complex, but a thing, ready to be packed. In my opinion, it was the event that marked the beginning of objectification of the Artificial Intelligence concept, its oversimplification, and devaluation.
-- Francis Hunger, Ph.D. Artistic Practice http://www.irmielin.org Mastodon https://dair-community.social/@databasecultures -- # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: https://www.nettime.org # contact: nettime-l-owner@lists.nettime.org